Facts & Statistics Behind Texting While Driving

Erik • August 14, 2017

According to the Don’t Text & Drive campaign, people who send or read texts while driving are 23 times more likely to be involved in an accident than other motorists. An accident can happen quickly and driving while distracted can endanger not only your life but the lives of others. Unfortunately, these cases of distracted driving are on the rise. Despite common misconception, it is not only teenagers who are guilty of texting while driving.

General Texting and Driving Statistics
According to the National Safety Council, about 1.6 million car accidents every year are caused by cell phone use while driving, including texting. Texting alone causes around 330,000 injuries per year and about 3,500 of all traffic fatalities every year are caused by distracted drivers, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). In 2017, one-quarter of all accidents are caused by texting. While there is a great deal of information about the dangers of drinking and driving, a Virginia Tech Transportation Institute study found that texting while driving is 6x more likely to cause a crash than drinking.

Texting while driving is dangerous because it takes your eyes from the road. Even answering a quick text draws your attention off the road for around 5 seconds. If you are driving 55mph, this is enough time to drive the length of a football field.

Teen Texting Statistics
Every day, 11 teenagers are killed due to texting. While 94% of teen drivers admitted the dangers of texting and driving in a AAA survey, one-third still admitted they do it anyway. About 21% of all teen drivers involved in a fatal car crash were using their cell phone at the time of the accident. Teens are also 5x more likely than adults to get into an accident due to cell phone use.

One study from the University of Utah put this problem into another perspective by indicating that a teen driver’s reaction time while using a phone is equal to a 70-year-old motorist who is not using a phone.

Teenage drivers get a lot of the blame for texting and driving, but many adults also text while driving. According to an AT&T survey, 98% of adults agree that texting while driving is unsafe, yet 49% admit to doing it. This means that adults are more likely to text and drive than teenagers.

The AT&T survey found that teens and adults do have different reasons for texting behind the wheel. Adults are more likely to do it because they claim it helps them feel connected and it has become second nature. Teens, on the other hand, report that a reply from them is expected within 5 minutes. Teens also report that their parents’ behavior is a major influence on their actions. AT&T concluded that failing to have a parental rule against texting behind the wheel is one of the greatest predictors of whether a teen will text and drive.

Nevada Bans Texting While Driving
AT&T found that the greatest deterrent for texting and driving is the threat of a license suspension, followed by the possibility of a hefty ticket. Many states are now tackling this problem by instituting similar laws.

In Nevada, texting, accessing the internet, and using a handheld cell phone while driving is a misdemeanor. The laws aren’t yet very strict; a first offense is a $50 ticket and it is not treated as a moving violation. A second or subsequent offense results in 4 points against the driver’s license.

Distracted Driving in Personal Injury Cases
If you have been hurt in an accident that was caused by a driver who was texting or using their cell phone, you have the right to seek financial compensation from the at-fault driver. A driver does not have to be breaking the law to be found at fault for an accident, but someone who is texting while driving is violating Nevada traffic laws. The police responding to the scene will report their belief as to the cause of the accident and who is at fault, but an experienced personal injury attorney can also help you investigate your accident and subpoena the other driver’s cell phone records if necessary.

Someone who is found responsible for an accident due to distracted driving can be liable for damages that include medical bills, lost wages, reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, and more. Contact Ahlander Injury Law to schedule your free consultation.

Understanding the Impact of Social Media on Personal Injury Claims

March 12, 2025
Social media platforms have become a significant aspect of our daily lives, influencing various fields, including the legal sector. In personal injury claims, social media has emerged as a crucial element in shaping the course and outcome of cases. With posts, comments, and images potentially serving as evidence, the integration of social media into legal strategies is on the rise. Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter have transformed into repositories of information that can be pivotal in personal injury claims. Attorneys are increasingly harnessing these platforms to gather evidence that supports or challenges claims. Posts, photos, and even comments can provide insights into the physical and emotional state of claimants or defendants, sometimes contradicting their official statements. This trend underscores the growing importance of social media in legal strategies. Evidence Gathering Through Social Media Attorneys and investigators now routinely collect data from social media to build or dismantle cases. Publicly available information can be scrutinized for evidence that either substantiates or refutes claims made in personal injury cases. For instance, a claimant alleging severe physical limitations might be contradicted by social media posts showing them engaging in activities that suggest otherwise. The legal implications of using social media data are profound. While information posted publicly is generally fair game, privacy settings can impact the admissibility of evidence. Courts often grapple with the balance between privacy rights and the need for transparency in legal proceedings. Understanding these nuances is essential for both legal professionals and claimants. For more insights on legal precedents involving social media evidence, visit the American Bar Association . Credibility and Social Media The credibility of claimants and defendants can be significantly influenced by their social media activity. Courts may perceive online personas differently from real-life behavior, and this discrepancy can affect judgments. Innocuous posts can sometimes contradict injury claims, leading to questions about the authenticity of the claimant's narrative. For example, a post depicting an injured claimant participating in physically demanding activities can cast doubt on their testimony. Such instances highlight the importance of maintaining a consistent narrative both online and offline. Best Practices for Social Media Use During a Claim For individuals involved in personal injury claims, managing social media presence becomes paramount. Legal experts advise claimants to be cautious about what they share online during an ongoing case. It is recommended to maintain strict privacy settings and avoid discussing case details publicly. Claimants should also refrain from posting content that might be misconstrued or used against them. Seeking legal advice on social media conduct during litigation is prudent. For further guidance, consider reviewing common legal issues with social media use . Real-Life Case Studies Numerous cases have demonstrated the pivotal role of social media in influencing legal outcomes. One notable instance involved a personal injury claim where the claimant's social media posts contradicted their injury narrative, leading to a diminished settlement. These examples serve as cautionary tales for future claimants, illustrating the lasting impact of digital footprints. Legal strategies must adapt to these realities, emphasizing the importance of consistency and discretion in online activities. Insights from Legal Experts Personal injury attorneys emphasize the transformative influence of social media in legal cases. Many legal professionals believe that social media will continue to shape the landscape of personal injury law. They advise claimants to be mindful of their online presence and consider the potential ramifications of their posts. Legal experts predict that as social media platforms evolve, so will the strategies employed by attorneys. This dynamic underscores the need for ongoing awareness and adaptation in legal practices concerning social media. Potential Pitfalls and Controversies The use of social media as evidence is not without its controversies. Ethical considerations and potential biases in interpreting online content pose challenges for the legal community. The debate over privacy rights versus the need for transparency continues to be a contentious issue. Critics argue that social media content can be taken out of context, leading to misinterpretations that affect legal outcomes. This ongoing debate highlights the need for clear guidelines and ethical standards in handling social media evidence. The Local Perspective: Social Media and Personal Injury Claims in Las Vegas In Las Vegas, the handling of social media evidence in personal injury cases reflects broader national trends. Local courts face unique challenges, balancing the need for transparency with privacy concerns. Cultural and geographical factors in Las Vegas, such as the city's vibrant social scene, may influence social media use and its impact on claims.  Local news stories often highlight cases where social media played a role in legal proceedings, offering valuable lessons for both claimants and attorneys in Nevada. Understanding the local legal landscape is crucial for navigating personal injury claims in Las Vegas effectively. In conclusion, social media has become an indispensable tool in personal injury claims, offering both opportunities and challenges. For those involved in legal proceedings, understanding the implications of social media activity is essential to navigating the complexities of personal injury law .

The Essential Guide to Choosing the Right Personal Injury Lawyer in Las Vegas

March 12, 2025
Selecting the right personal injury lawyer can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case. In Las Vegas, where the legal landscape presents unique challenges, having a skilled attorney by your side can alleviate the emotional and financial burdens associated with personal injury claims. The right lawyer not only guides you through complex legal procedures but also offers the support needed during such a stressful time. Choosing the wrong attorney can lead to prolonged case durations, unsatisfactory settlements, or even the dismissal of a case. In contrast, a competent lawyer can effectively navigate the intricacies of Nevada's legal system, ensuring that clients receive the compensation they deserve. Personal injury cases often come with a whirlwind of emotions, from anxiety to frustration, and a reliable lawyer can provide much-needed peace of mind. Evaluating Experience and Track Record When searching for a personal injury lawyer, their experience and track record are paramount. Lawyers with extensive experience in specific cases, such as auto accidents or slip and fall incidents, are often more adept at handling the nuances of these claims. A proven track record of successful settlements or verdicts can indicate a lawyer's capability to handle your case effectively. Verifying a lawyer's credentials is a critical step in the selection process. Prospective clients can check online reviews and seek testimonials from past clients to assess a lawyer's reputation. Websites like FindLaw provide authoritative insights into the importance of legal experience in personal injury cases, aiding in informed decision-making. Understanding Contingency Fee Structures Contingency fee structures are a common payment model in personal injury law. Under this arrangement, clients pay legal fees only if they win their case. This model differs from traditional hourly or flat-rate fees, offering financial relief to clients who may already be burdened by medical bills and other expenses. While contingency fees can be advantageous, clients should be aware of potential drawbacks. It's essential to discuss the percentage typically charged, which can range from 33 1/3% to 40% of the settlement. Negotiating fees upfront and clarifying any additional costs not covered by the contingency fee are crucial steps to ensure transparency and avoid surprises later. Benefits of Local Legal Expertise Hiring a lawyer with local expertise in Las Vegas can be highly beneficial. Familiarity with the local courts and legal community can lead to more efficient case handling and potentially better outcomes. Local lawyers understand the specific laws and regulations that impact personal injury cases in Nevada, providing a strategic advantage. For instance, Nevada has unique statutes of limitations and comparative negligence rules that can affect case proceedings. A lawyer well-versed in these local laws can provide invaluable guidance. More information about Nevada's legal environment can be found on the Nevada State Legislature website . Personal Compatibility and Communication The relationship between a client and their lawyer should be built on trust and effective communication. Personal compatibility is essential, as it ensures that the lawyer understands the client's needs and expectations. During initial consultations, clients should ask questions to gauge the lawyer's communication style and responsiveness. Empathy and understanding play crucial roles in building a strong client-lawyer relationship. A lawyer who listens and responds to concerns can make the legal process less daunting, fostering a sense of confidence and security in the client. Red Flags to Watch Out For Certain warning signs may indicate that a lawyer is not the right fit. A lack of transparency, unrealistic promises, or poor communication are common red flags. Ignoring these signs can lead to unsatisfactory case outcomes and increased stress. If a client feels their lawyer is not meeting their needs, it is possible to change legal representation. Doing so requires careful consideration and, in some cases, consultation with another attorney to ensure a smooth transition without negatively impacting the case. Additional Resources for Selecting a Lawyer For those seeking more information about personal injury lawyers, several resources are available. Legal directories and bar associations offer comprehensive listings and reviews of attorneys. Community resources in Las Vegas, such as legal aid organizations, provide consultations and guidance for individuals navigating personal injury claims. Thorough research and consideration of multiple sources are essential steps in selecting the right lawyer. By leveraging these resources, clients can make informed decisions and find a lawyer who aligns with their needs and expectations. Choosing the right personal injury lawyer in Las Vegas involves careful consideration of various factors, from experience and fee structures to personal compatibility and local expertise. By understanding these elements, clients can navigate the complexities of personal injury law with confidence, ensuring the best possible outcome for their case.

Understanding Comparative Negligence in Nevada's Personal Injury Law

March 11, 2025
Comparative negligence is a critical concept in personal injury law, aiming to fairly allocate fault among parties involved in an accident. In Nevada, this system ensures that individuals receive compensation proportionate to their level of responsibility in an incident. Nevada's legal framework adopts a modified comparative negligence system, which includes the 50% rule. This rule stipulates that an injured party can only recover damages if they are 50% or less at fault for the accident. This approach balances accountability and compensation, allowing victims to receive fair settlements while discouraging negligence. The evolution of comparative negligence in Nevada reflects broader changes in the legal landscape. Historically, the state followed a contributory negligence model, which barred any recovery if the injured party was even slightly at fault. Over time, this was deemed too harsh, leading to the adoption of the more equitable comparative negligence system. This shift aligns with a national trend towards more nuanced fault allocation in personal injury cases. For more in-depth information on comparative negligence, consider visiting [Cornell Law School's Legal Information Institute]( https://www.law.cornell.edu/ ). Shared Fault and Its Impact on Compensation Determining shared fault in personal injury cases involves assessing each party's actions leading to the incident. Courts and insurance companies examine evidence such as eyewitness accounts, accident reports, and expert testimony to assign a fault percentage to each party involved. This percentage directly impacts the compensation an injured party can receive. For example, if a plaintiff is found 30% at fault in an accident resulting in $100,000 in damages, they would be eligible to recover $70,000. Being found partially at fault can significantly affect the overall compensation, as the reduction is directly proportional to the assigned fault percentage. Insurance companies often leverage comparative negligence to negotiate settlements, potentially arguing for a higher fault percentage to minimize payout obligations. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for victims seeking fair compensation. Comparative Negligence in Action: Real-World Examples Nevada courts have seen various personal injury cases where comparative negligence was a pivotal factor. For instance, in a notable case involving a multi-car accident in Las Vegas, the court meticulously examined each driver's actions to determine fault percentages. The plaintiff, initially seeking full compensation, was found to be 20% at fault due to minor speeding. Consequently, their compensation was adjusted accordingly, illustrating how fault determination impacts outcomes. These cases underscore the importance of thorough evidence collection and legal representation. In another case involving a slip and fall incident at a Henderson retail store, the court considered the plaintiff's footwear and the store's maintenance records. The plaintiff was deemed 10% at fault for not wearing appropriate shoes, affecting their compensation. Such examples highlight the nuanced nature of fault allocation and the importance of legal expertise in navigating these complexities. Comparison with Other States' Negligence Laws Nevada's modified comparative negligence law stands in contrast to other states' systems, such as pure comparative negligence and contributory negligence. In states with pure comparative negligence, a plaintiff can recover damages regardless of their fault level, even if it exceeds 50%. Conversely, contributory negligence states bar recovery if the plaintiff is even 1% at fault. Nevada's approach offers a middle ground, promoting fairness and accountability. The pros of Nevada's system include a more balanced fault assessment, encouraging responsible behavior while still allowing victims to seek compensation. However, critics argue that it may still limit recovery for some victims compared to pure comparative systems. For a comprehensive comparison of state negligence laws, visit [Nolo's legal encyclopedia]( https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/state-negligence-laws.html ). Tips for Victims to Minimize Their Share of Fault Personal injury victims can take several steps to minimize their fault percentage and strengthen their cases. Gathering robust evidence is crucial; photographs of the accident scene, witness statements, and police reports can provide valuable support. Ensuring timely medical documentation also helps establish the extent of injuries. Legal representation plays a vital role in effectively presenting a victim's case. Experienced attorneys can skillfully argue against inflated fault claims and negotiate better settlements. When communicating with insurance companies, maintaining consistency in statements and promptly addressing inquiries can prevent misunderstandings that might increase perceived fault. By following these strategies, victims can enhance their chances of receiving fair compensation while navigating Nevada's comparative negligence system. Understanding the intricacies of this legal framework is essential for those seeking justice in personal injury cases .
More Posts
Share by: